Tommy Robredo vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

T. Robredo vs B. Van De Zandschulp

Tommy Robredo
Tommy Robredo

Flag ESP ESP

l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Botic Van De Zandschulp

Flag NED NED

l
w
w
w
w
w
l
l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

43
Age
29
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
83
5
Best Rank
22
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$6.9M
Career Money
$3.7M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-To-Head: Robredo 1 - 0 Zandschulp

They have played 3 sets in total, with Tommy Robredo winning 2 and Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Tommy Robredo and Botic Van De Zandschulp was at the Alphen Challenger, 06-09-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Tommy Robredo getting the victory 6-7(1) 6-3 7-6(2).

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Robredo1
Zandschulp0
Last H2H Matches:

(R1Alphen Challenger(09-06-17)

Clay
ESP Flag
Tommy Robredo
6
6
7
NED Flag
Botic Van De Zandschulp
7
3
6

T. Robredo vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Profile

Stats
$6,853,015Career Prize Money$3,660,365
59.45% (692-472)Career Total W/L61.20% (377-239)
1Clay0
19Titles7
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss45.16% (14-17)

T. Robredo vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Match Preview

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tommy Robredo has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 41.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tommy Robredo, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 46.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Tommy Robredo has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 53.31% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Tommy Robredo has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 50.79% (W/L 0/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Tommy Robredo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 386/ 217), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 53/ 52). Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15).
  • Player level: In the last year, Tommy Robredo has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 54.05% of matches (W/L 20/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tommy Robredo winning 1 times and Botic Van De Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tommy Robredo winning 2 and Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Tommy Robredo and Botic Van De Zandschulp was at the Alphen Challenger, 06-09-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Tommy Robredo getting the victory 6-7(1) 6-3 7-6(2).
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:41:40.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tommy Robredo has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 142.81.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tommy Robredo has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Tommy Robredo has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 34.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tommy Robredo vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Robredo vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won1
19Games Won16
2Aces (Total)3
2Total Double Faults8
2:41:40Avg. Match Time2:41:40
71% (82/116)1st Serve %70% (92/132)
65% (53/82)1st Serve Win %67% (62/92)
50% (17/34)2nd Serve Win %35% (14/40)
45% (5/11)Break Pts Won %20% (3/15)
42% (56/132)Return Pts Won %40% (46/116)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won → Match Won0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won → Match Lost100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Lost → Match Won0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Robredo 0%, Zandschulp 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Robredo 0%, Zandschulp 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Robredo 0%, Zandschulp 56%.

T. Robredo Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayBarcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona - 18-04-2022

R1

ESPB. Zapata
L
6-1 6-1
HardMonterrey Challenger - 07-03-2022

R2

FRAG. Blancaneaux
L
6-3 6-1

R1

JPNK. Uchida
W
6-3 6-3
ClayBarcelona Challenger - 04-10-2021

R1

BULD. Kuzmanov
L
6-0 6-1
GrassWimbledon - London - 28-06-2021

Q1

CZET. Machac
L
7-5 4-6 10-8

B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardChengdu Open - Chengdu - 15-09-2025

R1

USAM. Mcdonald
L
6-4 3-6 6-3
I.hardDavis Cup, World Group, Q2, NED-ARG 1-3 - 08-09-2025

Rubber 2

ARGF. Cerundolo
L
7-6(4) 6-1
HardU.S. Open - New York - 25-08-2025

R1

DENH. Rune
L
6-3 7-6(4) 7-6(2)
HardWinston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem - 18-08-2025

F

HUNM. Fucsovics
L
6-3 7-6(3)

QF

CHNB. Yunchaokete
W
6-3 5-7 6-3
banner

T. Robredo vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
59.45% (692/472)YTD Win/Loss61.20% (377/239)
56.16% (1654/1291)Sets Win/Loss58.09% (862/622)
51.85% (14670/13625)Games Win/Loss53.02% (7449/6600)
56.65% (196/150)Hard Win/Loss58.40% (73/52)
64.01% (386/217)Clay Win/Loss61.59% (178/111)
50.31% (80/79)Indoor Hard W/L65.14% (114/61)
53.57% (30/26)Grass Win/Loss44.44% (12/15)
0.2Aces Per Game0.44
2826Aces Total3024
0.12Double Faults Per Game0.33
1681Total Double Faults2257
1st MatchAverage Match Time1:36:40
82.77Average Opponent Rank392.47
64% (37589/58477)1st Serve %62% (25246/41015)
69% (26079/37589)1st Serve Win %72% (18067/25246)
52% (10897/20914)2nd Serve Win %48% (7579/15772)
42% (2344/5619)Break Points Won % (Total)43% (1861/4325)
39% (22983/59358)Return Points Win %41% (17214/42372)
62.90% (117/69)Slam W/L58.93% (33/23)
56.20% (136/106)Masters W/L49.06% (26/27)
54.55% (12/10)Cups W/L60.00% (12/8)
59.96% (298/199)Main Tour W/L51.72% (75/70)
33.33% (1/2)Tour Finals W/L0% (0/0)
60.00% (126/84)Challenger W/L63.33% (76/44)
0% (0/0)Futures W/L69.82% (155/67)
59% (574/975)Best of 3 Sets Win %62% (349/560)
62% (111/178)Best of 5 Sets Win %49% (21/43)
54% (228/425)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)54% (105/195)
61% (227/371)Deciding Set Win %57% (116/203)
88% (624/551)1st Set Won, Won Match89% (354/315)
12% (624/72)1st Set Won, Lost Match11% (354/38)
26% (540/141)1st Set Lost, Won Match23% (260/61)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?